Wednesday, May 23, 2012

RWJF improperly coerced lawmakers thru surrogates (ALA, ACS, CTFK, etc) to implement laws (smoking bans) that destroyed 165,000+ jobs

The impropriety is that RWJF is closely tied to Johnson & Johnson Company, which manufactures or owns Nicoderm, Nicotrol, Nicorette, Commit (pharmaceutical nicotine products) as one of J & J's largest shareholders (the only stock that RWJF owns incidentally) and the fact that RWJF board members are former J & J executives and / or J & J board members; RWJF's push to ban tobacco nicotine use, appears to be profit and market driven. As a matter of fact, Blue Cross Blue Shield of MN reported that the use of pharmaceutical nicotine products aforementioned tripled after implementation of said smoking bans.
To understand RWJF's interest in sugar bans   click picture to enlarge

Moreover, the real issue with these rent seeking laws is that they unnecessarily destroy jobs and our economy. At least 5,500 hospitality closings are chronicled in these four links: (at an average of 30 employees per hospitality establishment there's a minimum of 165,000 job losses since smoking bans were enacted)

Clearly, it is time to reverse the smoking bans imposed on privately owned bars & restaurants and/or force RWJF /J & J to compensate those of us in the hospitality and hospitality support industries.

Also visit our sponsors at bottom of webpage
  • Why a Non-Smoker Fights the Pro-Smoking Ban Lies
  • Is RWJF, a 501(c)3, violating IRS rules by funding pro-smoking ban lobbyists?
  • RWJF funds and promotes universal healthcare policies which are the basis for and primary objective of Obamacare
  • Boycott these special interests (J & J) who destroyed the hospitality industry & jobs
  • Is the smoking ban movement fueled by pharmaceutical nicotine interests?
  • Now that smoking bans have been implemented, what can be done?
  • How do smoking ban lobbyists profit from smoking bans?
  • Pharmaceutical interests project the alternative nicotine marketplace to be $4.6 billion +
  • WHO report secondhand smoke doesn't cause cancer
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? NO
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? Part 2
  • Why does UCSF researcher Stanton Glantz support smoking bans?
  • OSHA standards prove SHS is not a health hazard
  • Tired of the nanny-state, big, socialized, corrupt, government legislation coming out of our state and federal capitols these days? Vote Republican in November 2010 & 2012

    Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11


    "Though we may not be able to protect your business property rights, we certainly support your Second Amendment Rights"

    Shop for Aircleaners

    Combustion Engine Emissions Eliminator (CE3)