Thursday, November 15, 2007

Johns Hopkins air quality testing of secondhand smoke proves yet again that levels are hundreds of times safer than OSHA regulations

Clearing the Air has informed readers of numerous air quality test results which proved that secondhand smoke is not an occupational hazard........yet uniformed lawmakers around the country continue to pass smoking bans based on the special interests' argument that secondhand smoke is a workplace health hazard. If they would simply consider the air quality test results in comparison to OSHA regulations there is only one conclusion an INFORMED lawmaker could come to......the special interest Nicoderm funded activists are pulling the wool over their eyes.

Now a
recent series of air quality test results from Johns Hopkins proves once again the facts that have been confirmed in every other comprehensive secondhand smoke test result.

The study is supported by the American Cancer Society and the Flight Attendants Medical Research Institute.

The Johns Hopkins test results ranged from 2.1 to 16.9 micrograms (µg)/m3 (cubic meter) of airborne nicotine in smoking allowed establishments. However, what Johns Hopkins neglects to mention in the article is that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has a permissible exposure limit (pel) for airborne nicotine .....it is 0.5 milligrams (mg)/m3, which equals 500 micrograms (µg)/m3.


So the JH test results prove that secondhand smoke levels at bars and restaurants in Baltimore, MD are 29.6 (500 divided by 16.9) to 238 (500 divided by 2.1) times SAFER than OSHA regulations.

Over and over again the facts prove that pro-smoking ban activists are misleading lawmakers, the media and society into enacting unnecessary and arbitrary laws, which are eliminating thousands of businesses and tens of thousands of jobs.

Additionally, smoking bans have had a profound effect on the worldwide economy:

http://cleanairquality.blogspot.com/2009/03/worldwide-economic-meltdown-and.html

Also visit our sponsors at bottom of webpage
  • Why a Non-Smoker Fights the Pro-Smoking Ban Lies
  • Is RWJF, a 501(c)3, violating IRS rules by funding pro-smoking ban lobbyists?
  • RWJF funds and promotes universal healthcare policies which are the basis for and primary objective of Obamacare
  • Boycott these special interests (J & J) who destroyed the hospitality industry & jobs
  • Is the smoking ban movement fueled by pharmaceutical nicotine interests?
  • Now that smoking bans have been implemented, what can be done?
  • How do smoking ban lobbyists profit from smoking bans?
  • Pharmaceutical interests project the alternative nicotine marketplace to be $4.6 billion +
  • WHO report secondhand smoke doesn't cause cancer
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? NO
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? Part 2
  • Why does UCSF researcher Stanton Glantz support smoking bans?
  • OSHA standards prove SHS is not a health hazard
  • Tired of the nanny-state, big, socialized, corrupt, government legislation coming out of our state and federal capitols these days? Vote Republican in November 2010 & 2012
  • NRA.org

    Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

    SILVER BULLET GUN OIL CONTAINS 13% USDA LIQUEFIED PIG
FAT

    "Though we may not be able to protect your business property rights, we certainly support your Second Amendment Rights"

    Shop for Aircleaners

    Combustion Engine Emissions Eliminator (CE3)