Thursday, November 09, 2006

It's time for a new tactic when considering lawsuits to overturn smoking bans

Every group which files suit to block the smoking bans seem to use some form of constitionality argument......and they nearly always lose.

How about a new tactic folks......these bans all pass based on the argument / justification of "health hazard"....yet the 2 most comprehensive air quality studies I know of point out that secondhand smoke levels are 15 - 25,000 times SAFER than OSHA regulations for secondhand smoke....in other words NO HEALTH HAZARD.

It's time to challange the smoking bans on the fundamental claim of being a health hazard......which is false...then we will start seeing a reversal of these bans:

http://cleanairquality.blogspot.com/2006/02/air-quality-testing-and-secondhand.html

http://cleanairquality.blogspot.com/2004/04/american-cancer-society-test-results.html

http://cleanairquality.blogspot.com/2005/12/ventilation-not-legislation.html

Afterall, we let OSHA decide when welding smoke is too hazardous in our factories......or should we let politicians decide that also?

http://cleanairquality.blogspot.com/2005/10/secondhand-smoke-in-bars-restaurants.html

Also visit our sponsors at bottom of webpage
  • Why a Non-Smoker Fights the Pro-Smoking Ban Lies
  • Is RWJF, a 501(c)3, violating IRS rules by funding pro-smoking ban lobbyists?
  • RWJF funds and promotes universal healthcare policies which are the basis for and primary objective of Obamacare
  • Boycott these special interests (J & J) who destroyed the hospitality industry & jobs
  • Is the smoking ban movement fueled by pharmaceutical nicotine interests?
  • Now that smoking bans have been implemented, what can be done?
  • How do smoking ban lobbyists profit from smoking bans?
  • Pharmaceutical interests project the alternative nicotine marketplace to be $4.6 billion +
  • WHO report secondhand smoke doesn't cause cancer
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? NO
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? Part 2
  • Why does UCSF researcher Stanton Glantz support smoking bans?
  • OSHA standards prove SHS is not a health hazard
  • Tired of the nanny-state, big, socialized, corrupt, government legislation coming out of our state and federal capitols these days? Vote Republican in November 2010 & 2012
  • NRA.org

    Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

    SILVER BULLET GUN OIL CONTAINS 13% USDA LIQUEFIED PIG
FAT

    "Though we may not be able to protect your business property rights, we certainly support your Second Amendment Rights"

    Shop for Aircleaners

    Combustion Engine Emissions Eliminator (CE3)