Clearing The Air

Wednesday, September 07, 2005

Raise tax revenue or stop tobacco usage...the Lunger & lawmakers seem to be at odds

If as the Lunger spins it, the new tobacco tax is causing people to quit smoking; then the new tax (fee) will not raise the required revenue it was intended to make up for the Minnesota budget shortfall.

On the other hand raising state revenue on the tobacco 'fee", means a statewide smoking ban is not a likely scenario.

Now, if MN. state lawmakers are smart, since the state budget now requires continued tobacco revenues they should pre-empt local city & county smoking ban ordinances. In other words no MN. city or county may pass a smoking ban as it would decrease MN. tax revenues.

posted by marcus aurelius @ 11:32 PM

<< Home

About Me

My Photo
Name: marcus aurelius
Location: Minnesota, United States

View my complete profile

  • Also visit our sponsors at bottom of webpage
  • Boycott these special interests (J & J) who destroyed the hospitality industry & jobs
  • Why does UCSF researcher Stanton Glantz support smoking bans?
  • NRA.org

    Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

    SILVER BULLET GUN OIL CONTAINS 13% USDA LIQUEFIED PIG
FAT

    "Though we may not be able to protect your business property rights, we certainly support your Second Amendment Rights"

    Shop for Aircleaners

    Combustion Engine Emissions Eliminator (CE3)


     

     

     

    Statcounter