Saturday, July 23, 2005

NASA taking pre-emptive action?

My father worked behind the scenes in a television control room in the late 60's to early 70's so I had an understanding of the differences between videotaped and live television feed at an early age. When I watched the moon landings I wondered how the live television footage we were watching was possible, rather than blindly accepting the pictures we were seeing as fact. I will admit I have questioned the ability of live television broadcasting from the moon in the early 70's. Afterall, the Moon is 384,400 km (or 238,855.086296 miles) away, and a high level of radiation separates that distance. We could get live television feed from the moon 238,855.086296 miles away, but were unable to get live television feed from Vietnam 8,000 miles away?

1966, 3-day-old film of Vietnam War appeared on nightly network news in USA.

1969, live television transmission of man first setting foot on the moon.

....Wideband technology still was primitive in the late '60s. Programs on videotape and film were rotated among detachments using a weekly film flight and postal mail. ....... Troops watched favorite stateside series such as Bonanza, Mission Impossible, Gunsmoke, Laugh-In and Hawaii Five-O..... Tape-delayed NFL football games and the ever-popular Roller Derby were other highlights...

I never really questioned the validity of the moon landings though, until this curious pre-emptive email from NASA.

Though I still don't care enough about the subject to consider myself a conspiracy thinks thou dost protest too much.

Also visit our sponsors at bottom of webpage
  • Why a Non-Smoker Fights the Pro-Smoking Ban Lies
  • Is RWJF, a 501(c)3, violating IRS rules by funding pro-smoking ban lobbyists?
  • RWJF funds and promotes universal healthcare policies which are the basis for and primary objective of Obamacare
  • Boycott these special interests (J & J) who destroyed the hospitality industry & jobs
  • Is the smoking ban movement fueled by pharmaceutical nicotine interests?
  • Now that smoking bans have been implemented, what can be done?
  • How do smoking ban lobbyists profit from smoking bans?
  • Pharmaceutical interests project the alternative nicotine marketplace to be $4.6 billion +
  • WHO report secondhand smoke doesn't cause cancer
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? NO
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? Part 2
  • Why does UCSF researcher Stanton Glantz support smoking bans?
  • OSHA standards prove SHS is not a health hazard
  • Tired of the nanny-state, big, socialized, corrupt, government legislation coming out of our state and federal capitols these days? Vote Republican in November 2010 & 2012

    Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11


    "Though we may not be able to protect your business property rights, we certainly support your Second Amendment Rights"

    Shop for Aircleaners

    Combustion Engine Emissions Eliminator (CE3)