Wednesday, April 06, 2005

New moonbats in the belfry...

It seems there are new regular visitors to The Attic.....the comments on certain posts, shows that the health Nazis are familiar with computers and the internet, I wonder if they realize CRT tubes are a health risk?

Well thanks American-keep-the-media-attention-on-us-while-we-lobby-politicians-for-unnecessary-smoking-bans,-it-keeps-the-donations-and-grant-dollars-rolling-in-Association we welcome uninformed health Nazis like your organization, so that we can educate you with some of the tenets you may have missed in public school, namely science and math.

Did you know the city of St. Louis Park, MN. Environmental Health Dept. test the air quality in all 19 bars & restaurants in its jurisdiction to measure the concentrations of secondhand smoke; the median result was 0.0000033 g/ cu.M. And then my organization compare the SLP study to OSHA permissible exposure limits (pel), yes OSHA has a safe (pel) for secondhand smoke (nicotine) it is 0.0005 g/ cu.M., and the mathematical result is that secondhand smoke concentrations are 150 times safer than OSHA (pel).

So welcome, feel free to rummage around The Attic. Hope the facts presented in some of these posts don't offend you........Oh, maybe you didn't hear ....secondhand smoke concentrations in bars & restaurants is 150 times safer than OSHA regulations. It's going to be near impossible for your group & the medical industry

(the same medical industry which sells nicotine patches, lozenges, and alternative nicotine delivery systems?)

(Speaking of which, talk about smoking gun..... )
........."The proper regulatory response is to implement a strategy that levels the regulatory playing field between the cigarette and AND products." (....alternative nicotine delivery system (ANDS)). Pharmaceutical companies are urged to be more aggressive marketers. "I think it important that drug manufacturers, who will profit from less cigarette sales, pursue this in their advertising and that they lift any voluntary restraints they have from directly competing with tobacco products and attacking the tobacco industry"..............
but I digress.

to convince any more government officials there is a health hazard in secondhand smoke when even OSHA says that employees are safe.....(more so the customers, since their visit is far less than 8 hours.)

Also visit our sponsors at bottom of webpage
  • Why a Non-Smoker Fights the Pro-Smoking Ban Lies
  • Is RWJF, a 501(c)3, violating IRS rules by funding pro-smoking ban lobbyists?
  • RWJF funds and promotes universal healthcare policies which are the basis for and primary objective of Obamacare
  • Boycott these special interests (J & J) who destroyed the hospitality industry & jobs
  • Is the smoking ban movement fueled by pharmaceutical nicotine interests?
  • Now that smoking bans have been implemented, what can be done?
  • How do smoking ban lobbyists profit from smoking bans?
  • Pharmaceutical interests project the alternative nicotine marketplace to be $4.6 billion +
  • WHO report secondhand smoke doesn't cause cancer
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? NO
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? Part 2
  • Why does UCSF researcher Stanton Glantz support smoking bans?
  • OSHA standards prove SHS is not a health hazard
  • Tired of the nanny-state, big, socialized, corrupt, government legislation coming out of our state and federal capitols these days? Vote Republican in November 2010 & 2012

    Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11


    "Though we may not be able to protect your business property rights, we certainly support your Second Amendment Rights"

    Shop for Aircleaners

    Combustion Engine Emissions Eliminator (CE3)