Friday, March 18, 2005

BMJ published secondhand smoke air quality test results

Tobacco Control 2005;14:60-63© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


Environmental tobacco smoke exposure in public places of European cities

M Nebot1, M J López1, G Gorini2, M Neuberger3, S Axelsson4, M Pilali5, C Fonseca6, K Abdennbi7, A Hackshaw8, H Moshammer3, A M Laurent9, J Salles10, M Georgouli5, M C Fondelli2, E Serrahima10, F Centrich10 and S K Hammond11

1 Public Health Agency, Barcelona, Spain
2 Environmental and Occupational Epidemiology Unit Center for Onchologic Study and Prevention, Tuscany Region Research Institute, Italy
3 Institut of Environmental Health, University of Vienna, Austria
4 Orebro University Hospital, Sweden
5 Hellenic Cancer Society, Athens, Greece
6 Portuguese League Against Cancer, Portugal
7 Office Française le prevention du tabagisme, Paris, France
8 St Batholomew Hospital, The London School of Medicine, London, UK
9 Laboratoire d’Hygiène de la Ville de Paris, France
10 Laboratory of the Public Health Agency, Barcelona, Spain
11 School of Public Health, University of California, USA

Correspondence to: Maria José López Public Health Agency, Barcelona, Spain;

Background: Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) has important public health implications. The results of the first European multi-centre study that measured ETS exposure in a range of public places (transport, educational settings, and leisure facilities such as bars and restaurants) are presented.

Method: Nicotine vapour phase was measured using ETS passive samplers containing a filter treated with sodium bisulfate.

Results: Bars and discos are the places with the highest concentrations of nicotine from ETS, median ranging from 19 to 122 µg/m3. Restaurants had the next highest values. Concentrations of nicotine generally range from 0.1–5 µg/m3 in airports, and from 0.5–10 µg/m3 in train stations. Nicotine was also found in schools and universities, yet schools tended to have the lowest concentrations compared to all the other public places sampled. In hospitals levels were generally below 5 µg/m3.

Conclusions: Although there is some variability between cities, this study shows that tobacco smoke is present in most of the studied public places. The study also showed that in areas where smoking is prohibited, concentrations of nicotine are lower than in areas where smoking is allowed but they are not zero. The results of this study indicate that policies should be implemented that would effectively reduce levels of tobacco smoke in public areas.

This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)

M. S. Jaakkola and J. J. K. JaakkolaImpact of smoke-free workplace legislation on exposures and health: possibilities for prevention.Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2006; 28(2): 397 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

D. Rosenfield, D. G. Manuel, and D. A. AlterThe Smoking Regulatory Index: a new way to measure public health performance.Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 9, 2006; 174(10): 1403 - 1404. [Full Text] [PDF]

M Mulcahy, D S Evans, S K Hammond, J L Repace, and M ByrneSecondhand smoke exposure and risk following the Irish smoking ban: an assessment of salivary cotinine concentrations in hotel workers and air nicotine levels in barsTob. Control, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 384 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Read all
Why does press ignore these results?
Manfred A Neuberger
Tobacco Control Online, 18 Mar 2005
[Full text]

Also visit our sponsors at bottom of webpage
  • Why a Non-Smoker Fights the Pro-Smoking Ban Lies
  • Is RWJF, a 501(c)3, violating IRS rules by funding pro-smoking ban lobbyists?
  • RWJF funds and promotes universal healthcare policies which are the basis for and primary objective of Obamacare
  • Boycott these special interests (J & J) who destroyed the hospitality industry & jobs
  • Is the smoking ban movement fueled by pharmaceutical nicotine interests?
  • Now that smoking bans have been implemented, what can be done?
  • How do smoking ban lobbyists profit from smoking bans?
  • Pharmaceutical interests project the alternative nicotine marketplace to be $4.6 billion +
  • WHO report secondhand smoke doesn't cause cancer
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? NO
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? Part 2
  • Why does UCSF researcher Stanton Glantz support smoking bans?
  • OSHA standards prove SHS is not a health hazard
  • Tired of the nanny-state, big, socialized, corrupt, government legislation coming out of our state and federal capitols these days? Vote Republican in November 2010 & 2012

    Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11


    "Though we may not be able to protect your business property rights, we certainly support your Second Amendment Rights"

    Shop for Aircleaners

    Combustion Engine Emissions Eliminator (CE3)