Sunday, March 28, 2004

Unedited ACS AQ testing

October 2002

Chart of resultsPDF of the results

Nicotine Study of Secondhand Smoke Exposure Results

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the UK Government Department of Health Scientific Committee in Tobacco and Health and many other national and international agencies claim the evidence that exposures to passive smoking can cause lung cancer and conclude that secondhand smoke is a proven human carcinogen with no safe threshold of exposure. Erie County has a smoke-free regulation in force that restricts smoking in the indoor dining area of restaurants but not in the bar area or in stand alone bars or taverns, Niagara County does not have such a regulation and smoking is permitting without restriction in bars and in separate smoking sections in restaurants. Little information exists on the levels of secondhand smoke is present is venues with different smoking policies.


To examine ambient nicotine levels in venues where smoking is permitted and where smoking is not permitted in Erie and Niagara Counties to provide an assessment of the impact of smokefree regulations on decreasing levels of secondhand smoke.


In September 2002, air in 18 venues was sampled including restaurants with (n=4) and without (n=3) bar areas, stand alone bars (n=5), bowling alleys (n=2), bingo halls (n=2), and smoke-free hospitals (n=2). Volunteers wore a on their person while they were in each venue for a minimum of four hours exposure. Monitors were then sealed and sent to the laboratory for analysis to determine the amount of nicotine each monitor was exposed to in nanograms per eight hours of exposure. Nicotine levels greater than zero indicate exposure to secondhand smoke. Qualitative survey information was also obtained for each venue that included estimates of the number of people smoking and the volume of the room.

Dr. Joseph Bauer, Tobacco Research Scientist at The Roswell Park Cancer Institute, wears the passive nicotine air monitor.

Results: What the American Cancer Society test results mean.

The results are summarized in the Figure. There was no nicotine exposure is the four venues that are smoke-free by law, including two restaurants without bars in Erie County. In places where smoking is allowed in some places, but restricted in others, detectable levels of nicotine were observed in all seven venues sampled ranging from 20 nanograms/8 hours exposed in the dining area outside an enclosed smoking room to 110 nanograms/8 hours exposed in bowling alleys. In places where smoking is unrestricted, levels of nicotine were approximately ten times higher than those observed in places where smoking is restricted including average readings of 539 nanograms/8 hours exposed in stand alone bars, 814 nanograms/8 hours exposed during a at a stand alone bar, and 940 nanogram/8 hours exposed in bingo halls.


Venues that were completely smoke-free by law had no exposure to secondhand smoke. Secondhand smoke exposure was present in venues not covered by smoke-free regulations, especially those venues where smoking is currently unrestricted. However, in comparing the American Cancer Society air quality testing to the OSHA permissible exposure limits for airborne nicotine the testing proved secondhand smoke concentrations were
532 - 25,000 times SAFER than OSHA regulations......definitely not a health hazard.


This project was funded by a grant from the Erie/Niagara Tobacco Free Coalition and the American Cancer Society. Contributors to this study were Andrew Hyland, PhD, Joseph Bauer, PhD, and Michael Cummings, PhD, MPH from Roswell Park Cancer Institute and Catherine Vladutiu from the American Cancer Society.

Also visit our sponsors at bottom of webpage
  • Why a Non-Smoker Fights the Pro-Smoking Ban Lies
  • Is RWJF, a 501(c)3, violating IRS rules by funding pro-smoking ban lobbyists?
  • RWJF funds and promotes universal healthcare policies which are the basis for and primary objective of Obamacare
  • Boycott these special interests (J & J) who destroyed the hospitality industry & jobs
  • Is the smoking ban movement fueled by pharmaceutical nicotine interests?
  • Now that smoking bans have been implemented, what can be done?
  • How do smoking ban lobbyists profit from smoking bans?
  • Pharmaceutical interests project the alternative nicotine marketplace to be $4.6 billion +
  • WHO report secondhand smoke doesn't cause cancer
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? NO
  • Do smoker's cost society more money than non-smoker's? Part 2
  • Why does UCSF researcher Stanton Glantz support smoking bans?
  • OSHA standards prove SHS is not a health hazard
  • Tired of the nanny-state, big, socialized, corrupt, government legislation coming out of our state and federal capitols these days? Vote Republican in November 2010 & 2012

    Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11


    "Though we may not be able to protect your business property rights, we certainly support your Second Amendment Rights"

    Shop for Aircleaners

    Combustion Engine Emissions Eliminator (CE3)